I Became Park Jeong-ui’s Nephew - Chapter 318



Only Noblemtl

He became Park Jeong-ui’s nephew. – (318)

“Mongolia’s nuclear weapons have been completely dismantled.”

“Okay, everything is going according to the enemy’s will.”

This is the Korean Central Intelligence Agency, and the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Kim Hak-young, listened to incidents and accidents occurring overseas.

One of them is the nuclear weapons issue,

The main reasons for AOPR’s invasion of India were social unrest + epidemics + religious oppression + ethnic conflicts causing refugees and resulting disruption of international order, but the main cause was also nuclear weapons.

As India developed nuclear weapons, Pakstan also joined in and even Turkey was adversely affected. However, if you look closely, the Soviet Union is the culprit behind all these incidents.

Didn’t the cancer cells spread everywhere because the Soviet Union provided nuclear technology to India? And the Soviet Union deployed nuclear weapons in Mongolia to check China.

It was 1960, and the Soviet Union had failed to reach an agreement with China on a border dispute, and China was irritating the Soviet Union by deploying conventional weapons along the border.

Mongolia is also concerned about Chinese invasion.

The Soviet Union took advantage of this to sign a Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation with Mongolia in 1966, and from 1967, Soviet troops and nuclear weapons began to be deployed in Mongolia.

By 1969, Mongolia had over 70,000 troops, some of whom possessed intermediate-range ballistic missiles that contained nuclear warheads.

The exact number is unknown, but it is estimated that Mongolia possessed around 400 ballistic missiles at the time. Not all of them were nuclear weapons, but it is true that Mongolia possessed nuclear weapons.

But that is now a thing of the past, and after persistent pursuit, the South Korean government has dismantled all ballistic missiles in Mongolia.

So, is East Asia completely free from the nuclear threat?

That’s not it either.

Britain once deployed nuclear weapons in Cyprus (an island in the Mediterranean) (1961-1975) in an attempt to keep its ally Iran on its side.

But not content with this, he deployed nuclear weapons in Malaysia (1961–1965), and Singapore followed suit.

Next is Germany,

Until then, Britain had been limited to spreading nuclear weapons developed by the United States around the world, but it deployed nuclear weapons produced domestically in Germany.

“America, you fucked us back then, didn’t you?”

“It’s your turn to eat shit now.”

Are those nuclear weapons aimed at the Soviet Union, which was threatening Germany, or at the United States, which was spreading nuclear weapons around the world?

To be blunt, it was aimed at the United States, not the Soviet Union.

The reason Britain took such an extreme approach was because the United States had backstabbed it. Britain had already tested nuclear weapons in 1932, but when World War II broke out, it was no longer able to conduct nuclear weapons research.

So, they sent scientists to the United States to help with the Manhattan Project, and in return, they agreed to transfer the relevant technology from the United States once the nuclear tests were over.

“You promised me back then, right? Hand over the nuclear technology immediately.”

“Well? Have you ever made such a promise?”

But America broke its promise.

Passing the McMahon Act to ban the transfer of nuclear materials and technology abroad only ended up irritating Britain.

It’s not like Britain sent scholars to America because it lacked technological capabilities.

Wouldn’t Britain, which conducted the world’s first nuclear test in 1932, be able to develop nuclear weapons on its own?

Ultimately, Britain succeeded in developing nuclear weapons in 1957 and deployed them in Germany, thereby blocking the US nuclear proliferation policy.

If Britain hadn’t stopped it at that time, the US would have flooded the world with its nuclear weapons.

However, it is true that America’s excessive expansion policy irritated Britain, and this led to France’s development of its own nuclear weapons.

As the saying goes, when whales fight, the shrimp’s back gets broken, and Malaysia, Singapore, Mongolia, and Korea were all affected by it. Ultimately, only by eliminating the nuclear weapons that exist around the world can Korea’s national defense be stable.

South Korea intends to eliminate all nuclear weapons around the world,

Of course, the United States is taking a cautious stance on this policy.

Because this is related to American hegemony,

A report from 1976 shows that the United States took this problem seriously.

[Nuclear weapons are necessary for military balance against hostile forces, and are deployed in countries that possess conventional weapons. However, the nuclear weapons storage sites in Europe appear to be vulnerable to terrorist attacks, and several nuclear weapons storage facilities have been confirmed to be vulnerable to surprise attacks by communist forces. Nuclear weapons should be redeployed for the sake of nuclear weapons security.]

Did the US really pursue nuclear arms reduction for peace?

In fact, they only strictly controlled the leak of related technology if nuclear facilities were attacked by enemy countries or communist forces.

Britain deployed nuclear weapons in Germany to take advantage of the US withdrawal of its nuclear weapons, but the US still maintained over 7,000 nuclear weapons overseas.

If we look at this history, it would not be an exaggeration to say that the nuclear threat was created by the United States.

Why is there no answer as to why Britain deployed nuclear weapons around the world and why the Soviet Union was serious about developing nuclear weapons?

Removing nuclear weapons deployed overseas means uprooting the American hegemony that once dominated the world. Isn’t now, when AOPR has taken over the world, the perfect opportunity to get rid of the remnants of the Cold War?

As South Korea removed Mongolia’s nuclear weapons, public opinion in the United States also flared.

“During the Cold War, the United States deployed nuclear weapons in Belgium, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Malaysia, and Singapore, but never deployed them in South Korea. This is highly unusual, given that the countries to which the United States deployed nuclear weapons were countries with conventional weapons. Why didn’t the United States deploy nuclear weapons in South Korea?”

Even American experts have called this a very unusual case.

South Korea, which possesses conventional weapons, is in a position where it can be threatened by communism at any time. The deployment of US nuclear weapons is focused on countries possessing conventional weapons, so why is South Korea the only one left out?

That’s because of the situation Korea was in at the time.

At that time, North Korea, which bordered South Korea, was receiving support from the Soviet Union, but possessed only conventional weapons and did not have the national power to invade South Korea on its own.

In contrast, South Korea had steadily built up its military power with support from the United States, and if nuclear weapons were deployed in such a country, there was a possibility that South Korea would run wild like the Nazis.

In fact, it is estimated that South Korea’s military power at the time was about three times that of North Korea.

The United States was not in a position to deploy nuclear weapons in South Korea.

But what if North Korea collapsed and South Korea shared a border with China and the Soviet Union? In such a situation, the United States would have to seriously consider deploying nuclear missiles in South Korea.

No, to be exact, this is the development that the US wanted.

The South Korean president’s raid on Pyongyang is still considered a shocking event, but was it really so?

Experts have concluded that this may have been the development the United States had wanted at the time.

“At that time, world opinion must have thought that the South Korean president was crazy. The United States was dismantling nuclear weapons and preventing nuclear proliferation, but as South Korea defeated North Korea, the United States was in a position where it had to deploy nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula. But now that I think about it, the South Korean president was not crazy. He made the right decision and launched a preemptive strike on North Korea.”

“What do you mean?”

“I told you, at that time, the United States was not removing its nuclear missiles deployed overseas for the sake of peace. It was simply concerned that nuclear facilities would be destroyed by enemy attacks and that the technology would be leaked. However, when South Korea attacked North Korea and China and the Soviet Union came to a border, the United States gained a justification to withdraw its nuclear proliferation policy.”

That’s actually the case.

The communist bloc was shocked when South Korea launched a preemptive strike against North Korea.

Both the Soviet Union and China were so preoccupied with Korea that they did not pay attention to anything else.

The fact that American nuclear bases scattered around the world were free from the threat of communist terrorist organizations, and the Soviet Union and China must have thought that the United States would unconditionally deploy nuclear missiles on the Korean Peninsula, but the United States did not deploy nuclear missiles on the Korean Peninsula.

The operation of Seongdong-gyeok-seo was a perfect fit,

Thanks to this, the United States was able to protect nuclear missile bases around the world.

This is the real reason why the US did not blame South Korea for its unilateral military action. If you think about it, South Korea protected the US’s nuclear hegemony.

Did the South Korean president go crazy and attack North Korea and massacre 2 million Pyongyang residents?

It was not a war driven by a mad desire to conquer the world like Hitler, but a calculated war in collusion with the United States.

The details will only be known once the top secret documents are released, but it cannot be denied that at the time, Marshal Park Sang-geun was America’s dog protecting America’s hegemony.

That guy is now kicking out nuclear weapons from all over the world?

This is why America cannot help but be embarrassed. The people who used to act as America’s dogs are now erasing America’s hegemony.

If things continue this way, it is only a matter of time before the shadow of America that has covered the world is lifted.

Public opinion opposing the war also supported Marshal Park Sang-geun’s policies.

***

“Your Majesty, can you reconsider the withdrawal of nuclear weapons?”

“What do you mean?”

“Nuclear weapons are not just weapons. They are also a political tool to deter war. If we get rid of them, the world may be engulfed in a major war.”

“I’ll say it again, I have my own thoughts and that’s why I’m doing this. Listen to the public sentiment of the world.”

This is Geumneung,

I had a serious conversation with the U.S. Secretary of State.

Nuclear facilities are being dismantled in various places, starting with Mongolia. From the US perspective, this is like letting go of the last lifeline it had been holding onto.

The dollar hegemony has collapsed, and America’s hegemony is no longer what it used to be, but isn’t it thanks to nuclear weapons around the world that we can save face?

The problem is that nuclear weapons are a burden to other countries.

Did Mongolia put away its nuclear weapons because of pressure from South Korea?

Nuclear weapons are also a burden to Mongolia.

Although they took on the nuclear weapons handed over by the Soviet Union under the pretext of preventing Chinese invasion, this alone was enough to provoke China.

Doesn’t the answer come from looking at the fact that at one time 70,000 Soviet troops were stationed in Mongolia?

Mongolia has been worried about Chinese invasion for almost a decade, but now it no longer needs to be.

China is now subordinate to Korea, and the Soviet Union has also been reorganized into Russia.

In this situation, the nuclear weapons that Mongolia has borne are just a burden, so wouldn’t it be better to give them up and receive economic support?

So, we disposed of our nuclear weapons as South Korea proposed.

Other countries have similar positions,

Malaysia, Singapore and the Philippines are now trying to escape the threat of nuclear weapons. The Soviet Union and China also collapsed, so why doesn’t the US dismantle its nuclear missiles?

Now, nuclear weapons are just a political tool for the United States to pressure other countries.

The South Korean government took advantage of this and won the hearts of many countries by dismantling Mongolia’s nuclear missiles.

Is this really a policy that a person with Parkinson’s disease would think about?

The judgment of the Korean leader is still intact, and Singapore and Malaysia are lining up with Korea.

The Philippines is expected to join them soon, which would shift hegemony in the South China Sea from the United States to South Korea.

If the United States does not want to be pushed out of this trend, it would be best to dismantle its nuclear weapons rather than maintain them.

I continued to pressure the State Department to follow suit.

It’s the same with Russia, I defended the position of countries with conventional weapons and won the support of 84 countries.

In times like these, not having nuclear weapons is actually an advantage.

Countries with only conventional weapons trusted South Korea, which did not have nuclear weapons, more than the United States and Russia, which had nuclear missiles.

Because we realized that if we join hands with those who have nuclear weapons, we will inevitably become subordinate to them.

Who would want to live in a dangerous world where everyone could be destroyed by nuclear weapons?

As numerous non-nuclear states joined South Korea, the international order began to reorganize around East Asia.