I Became Park Jeong-ui’s Nephew - Chapter 327
Only Noblemtl
He became Park Jeong-ui’s nephew. – (327)
“The expulsion of the Rohingya is like punishing the Japanese who lived in Korea during the Japanese colonial period. I believe that Korea will understand this issue as it is a country that has suffered the same pain as Myanmar.”
This is Myanmar, a sensitive issue that has become a social problem.
Myanmar society was divided between the majority Buddhists and the opposing Muslims, and Britain brought in the Rohingya Muslims in order to divide and rule Myanmar.
So, are the Rohingya a people group that should leave Myanmar?
The Rohingya are descendants of Arab traders who migrated to the kingdom of Arakan around 1430, which is believed to have existed in present-day Rakhine State in Myanmar.
Then, around 1784, when the Burmese Empire occupied this place, the Rohingya people were reduced to a subjugated people, but the Burmese government denies this very history.
“The claim that the Rohingya have been living in Burma since the 15th century is unfounded. They are Muslims who illegally migrated from Bangladesh during the British colonial period and have no right to live in Burma.”
The Myanmar military also did not recognize the Rohingya as a Myanmar nationality.
In 1982, the Citizenship Act was enacted, defining only native Myanmar nationals and the approximately 2.5 million Rohingya as illegal immigrants.
There are over 130 ethnic minorities in Myanmar, including the Han Chinese, but the Rohingya are the only ones who are not recognized as citizens.
But why are only the Rohingya people being persecuted like this?
This problem can be solved by applying it to Korean history.
During the Japanese colonial period, a whopping 800,000 Japanese people immigrated to Joseon.
From the standpoint of an independent Korea, aren’t these people something that should be eliminated from the mainland?
The Myanmar government’s position is that the Rohingya people also settled in Burma during the British colonial period and should be eliminated.
The problem is, by what standard do we view the history of the Rohingya? If the Rohingya are truly a Muslim people who have lived in Burma since the 15th century, then they too are entitled to be part of Myanmar.
But if they are an ethnic group that was introduced to Burmese society during the British colonial period, are they qualified to live in that land?
Myanmar is a member of the Asian Alliance led by Korea, and Korea is no longer a provincial state stuck in a corner of the peninsula, so it cannot ignore this problem.
So what kind of people are the Rohingya genetically?
South Korean scientists have obtained the DNA of the Rohingya people and are uncovering their true identity and history.
“The Rohingya are not a Muslim people. They are a mixed race of Caucasian and Austrian descent, and are clearly Bengalis.”
Here the truth comes out.
If the Rohingya are a Muslim people, there is no reason for them to have Bengali characteristics.
Their language is also Bengali, so if they had really been living in Myanmar and mixing with the locals since the 15th century, they would not have shown such characteristics.
It is clear that the Rohingya are illegal immigrants who entered Myanmar during the British colonial period. This has been proven through genetic analysis and scientific evidence, so it is no longer worth discussing.
So what standard will world public opinion apply to the Myanmar government that oppresses the Rohingya?
Ultimately, this incident will inevitably lead to a debate about British responsibility.
After securing colonies in Africa, Britain later expanded eastward and occupied India and Southeast Asia to secure natural resources.
Myanmar was also targeted in this process, as it is located next to large countries such as India and China, making it an ideal location for producing commercial crops.
The problem is the lack of population,
At that time, Myanmar had a small population, and the British brought ethnic minorities living near Bengal here to work.
This is the real identity of the Rohingya people,
It is clear that he is an illegal immigrant, but he did not come to Myanmar on his own.
So, is the reason the Rohingya are hated only because they are ‘illegal immigrants’? In fact, there is a more unfortunate truth hidden behind this.
The spark of the cause was India,
In southern India lived the Tamil people, who mainly acted as moneylenders and borrowers within the caste system.
They also moved to Myanmar in accordance with British policy.
They lent money to illegal immigrants and locals, charged high interest rates, and confiscated their land if they failed to repay the money on time.
In rural areas, they would lend money using land as collateral, and if the borrower could not repay the money on time, the land would be confiscated and they would become local landowners.
What should be noted here is that the Tamil people are also a Bengali people in a broad sense.
Do the people of Myanmar see a distinction between the Tamils and the Rohingyas?
This is where the resentment among Myanmar natives towards the Rohingya began to sprout.
However, there was another reason why the relationship between the two peoples crossed a river of no return, and that was the war between Britain and Japan.
The Japanese who invaded Myanmar broke up the Tamil farms and returned the land to the Burmese.
Britain, which watched this unfold, armed the Rohingya and used them as an army, and in the process, it is estimated that the Rohingya killed around 20,000 Burmese people.
Not only that, they destroyed Buddhist temples and massacred monks,
This incident has branded the Rohingya as the worst bastards in the world, more vicious than the Japanese and British, by the Myanmar people.
In the end, who is to blame?
Can the Rohingya be turned into victims who have become perpetrators, and can Korean society turn the frame around by making Rohingya = pro-Japanese?
The pro-Japanese collaborators may not feel wronged since they have done whatever they can, but the Rohingya people are only guilty of being dragged around by the logic of the powerful countries.
That dark history has only exploded into violence against ethnic Myanmar people and the destruction of Buddhist temples, so in that sense the Rohingya now deserve peace.
But if we leave it in Myanmar, it will only cause problems.
Here, the Korean leader made a fiery investment.
“We will give you empty land. Let the Rohingya move there and establish their own country.”
The inland is now overflowing with empty land.
The population is concentrated in the Henan-Shaanxi region, which is economically adjacent to Korea, and recently, Lianxiang moved to Hebei, leaving the western inland area empty.
Since there is still land left, what are we going to do with it if we leave it empty?
In addition, due to the harsh oppression of the Myanmar military, more than 700,000 Rohingya people were massacred, and many people migrated to neighboring countries such as Bangladesh, so the current population is less than 1 million.
How can a country with less than a million people become the leader of East Asia?
The South Korean government decided to relocate the Rohingya people inland,
Since it was a task to extract a tooth that had been aching, the Myanmar government also cooperated in the relocation of the Rohingya.
***
“The Rohingya need about $60 million to settle in a new land. If they have a good conscience, the countries responsible for this problem should provide the money. I would like to ask the UK and Japan to contribute $14 million each.”
This is the AOPR headquarters in New York,
I stand on the podium as the Commander-in-Chief of the AOPR Armed Forces.
The Rohingya problem, which the Korean government has already invested 30 million dollars in, still has a long way to go, and the UK and Japan must take responsibility for this problem.
Britain, which turned the Rohingya into illegal immigrants to exploit them as labor, and Japan, which took advantage of the local residents’ resentment against the Rohingya.
These two are the main culprits behind today’s Rohingya problem.
But isn’t it too irresponsible to keep your mouth shut?
If Korea, which had nothing to do with this incident, pays 30 million dollars and the two countries do not take any position, Korea will have no choice but to take corresponding measures.
I brought up Korean history here.
“I am also a person who knows how to use people for my own gain. During the Songho War, I incorporated 120,000 Japanese soldiers into the Korean army to supplement the shortage of soldiers.
That’s all. In order to use the 30 million labor force of Jinling and the 1.3 billion dollars of Shanghai’s financial capital, they recruited Jews. They used 30,000 Inner Mongolians for inhumane work. Furthermore, they sent hundreds of thousands of Korean soldiers to the battlefield for the sake of national gain.
I admit it all.
I used people as tools and that’s how I got to where I am today. But at least I don’t remember using people and then turning my back on them. Even when I made them do something that would kill them, I gave them money. I’ve never turned my back on them like someone else.”
This is not an excuse, it is a fact,
Japanese who fought in the Songho War still live there today, and the Geumneung people are leading peaceful lives in their own land.
There is no excuse for those who were subjected to human experiments (rare earth mining, drug testing) in Inner Mongolia, but at least they were compensated financially.
There is no room for leniency in paying for a person’s life with money, but at least they didn’t turn a blind eye like the UK or Japan.
What did Britain and Japan do while 700,000 Rohingya were killed by the military in Myanmar? They just kept their mouths shut instead of making excuses.
Did you think it would get overlooked if you pretended not to know?
The truth was revealed through persistent pursuit by the Korean government and AOPR administrators.
Are those who turn a blind eye to this worthy of being members of the international community?
Japan is already a member of AOPR and the UK is seeking to join, so apologizing and taking responsibility is a shortcut to being recognized as a member of the international community.
If they refuse, I will have no choice but to revoke their membership, so I will put the opinions of the 119 countries that have joined the AOPR to a vote.
The argument that Britain and Japan should be held accountable received 114 votes,
A letter was sent to both countries urging them to take responsibility.
***
“Mr. Isao, aren’t you Japanese? Why don’t you defend Japan’s position?”
“I am not Japanese. Don’t misunderstand.”
This is the AOPR headquarters,
The Japanese government, which was in a state of crisis, went to see AOPR Environment Minister Masakage Isao.
Isao Masakage is the most world-class figure produced by Japan.
He is the person who took the position of Minister of AOPR, which will become the cornerstone of the world government.
With such a person produced, Japan’s status will rise even further. Some even claim that Minister Isao’s face should be put on the 10,000 yen bill.
But that expectation was shattered,
Isao Masakage never thought of himself as Japanese.
As the Environment Minister of AOPR, you have to look at the world from an international perspective, and it is true that Japan’s invasion of Burma contributed to the Rohingya genocide.
But here you are making a statement defending Japan?
That was an unbecoming attitude for the AOPR’s environment minister.
Above all, Isao Masakage was appointed to this position thanks to the recommendation and support of the Korean leader, and naturally, he had no feelings toward Japan.
“I am the Minister of Environment of AOPR, not the Minister of Japan. And why can’t a country as big as Japan pay only $14 million? Korea spent a whopping $30 million to solve this problem. Please show a responsible attitude as befitting the world’s third-largest economy.”
The Japanese government eventually gave in.
Decided to formally apologize to the Rohingya and pay $14 million in compensation,
But Britain held on as long as it could.
The Rohingya are reiterating their position that they were not forcibly relocated to Myanmar but voluntarily migrated to make money.
Ultimately, Britain failed to join the AOPR.
This means that it is impossible to enter the Korean market with a population of 500 million, and the same goes for the United States with a population of 300 million.
Can Britain sustain its economy while neglecting a market of 800 million people?
There is no such thing as a business that does not care about money. He chose to spend $14 million and gain more.